<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Pixar vs. Dreamworks</title> <atom:link href="http://www.schadenfreude.net/2009/06/03/pixar-vs-dreamworks.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.schadenfreude.net/2009/06/03/pixar-vs-dreamworks.php</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Insider</title><link>http://www.schadenfreude.net/2009/06/03/pixar-vs-dreamworks.php/comment-page-1#comment-15118</link> <dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:18:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.schadenfreude.net/?p=20715#comment-15118</guid> <description>Dreamworks, to be fair, is awful. Their sad attempts to be urban and hip are pathetic, at best. The real truth is that the lousiness came from Jeffrey Katzenberg (the &quot;K&quot; in SKG). BTW, the &quot;G&quot; in SKG is Gefffen who is the head of Hollywood&#039;s gay mafia (the gay &quot;thought police&quot;), Anyway, Katzenberg is the one who is guilty of infecting the storylines with those awful wisecracking characters. I hope they go bankrupt.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamworks, to be fair, is awful. Their sad attempts to be urban and hip are pathetic, at best. The real truth is that the lousiness came from Jeffrey Katzenberg (the &#8220;K&#8221; in SKG). BTW, the &#8220;G&#8221; in SKG is Gefffen who is the head of Hollywood&#8217;s gay mafia (the gay &#8220;thought police&#8221;), Anyway, Katzenberg is the one who is guilty of infecting the storylines with those awful wisecracking characters. I hope they go bankrupt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff Edsell</title><link>http://www.schadenfreude.net/2009/06/03/pixar-vs-dreamworks.php/comment-page-1#comment-14656</link> <dc:creator>Jeff Edsell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:33:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.schadenfreude.net/?p=20715#comment-14656</guid> <description>I&#039;ve always said Pixar&#039;s greatest strength is not their technology, but their storytelling.To be fair to Dreamworks, though, several of their films are quite good. After an early hit with Shrek, they seemed to get lazy for a while. But &quot;Over The Hedge,&quot; the &quot;Madagascar&quot; films, and especially &quot;Kung Fu Panda&quot; are good. (Not quite Pixar-good, mind you, except for KFP.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always said Pixar&#8217;s greatest strength is not their technology, but their storytelling.</p><p>To be fair to Dreamworks, though, several of their films are quite good. After an early hit with Shrek, they seemed to get lazy for a while. But &#8220;Over The Hedge,&#8221; the &#8220;Madagascar&#8221; films, and especially &#8220;Kung Fu Panda&#8221; are good. (Not quite Pixar-good, mind you, except for KFP.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.schadenfreude.net @ 2012-02-12 06:04:33 -->
