Comments on: Stan Winston 1964-2008 http://www.schadenfreude.net/2008/06/16/stan-winston-1964-2008.php Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:53:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: Sandy Marshallhttp://www.schadenfreude.net/2008/06/16/stan-winston-1964-2008.php/comment-page-1#comment-8918 Sandy Marshall Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:20:41 +0000 http://www.schadenfreude.net/?p=15149#comment-8918 Couldn't agree more, seeing his name on a movie means I'm probably gonna buy it. Couldn’t agree more, seeing his name on a movie means I’m probably gonna buy it.

]]> By: Fred Moweryhttp://www.schadenfreude.net/2008/06/16/stan-winston-1964-2008.php/comment-page-1#comment-8916 Fred Mowery Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:35:48 +0000 http://www.schadenfreude.net/?p=15149#comment-8916 CGI, when used to augment things, is awesome. CGI characters? No soul. With all due respect to Rick Baker, who I think is a better makeup artist, Stan Winston was the best. CGI, when used to augment things, is awesome. CGI characters? No soul. With all due respect to Rick Baker, who I think is a better makeup artist, Stan Winston was the best.

]]>