Seperated at Birth?

richard-nixon-picture.jpg

My choice is to make sure that I safeguard the ability for presidents to get good decisions,” he said. “If the staff of a president operated in constant fear of being hauled before various committees to discuss internal deliberations, the president would not receive candid advice and the American people would be ill-served.
-George W. Bush, March 20, 2007

Officials-ImageF.00001.jpeg

It is absolutely necessary, if the President is to be able to do his job as the country expects, that he be able to talk openly and candidly with his advisers about issues and individuals. This kind of frank discussion is only possible when those who take part in it know that what they say is in strictest confidence.
-Richard M. Nixon, August 15, 1973

Of course the two men are not really comparable, but clear your mind for a second and give me an objective view of the person I’m about to decribe. They have nothing to hide, they’ve told no lies, they’ve done nothing wrong and to prove it they’re willing to testify but only if it’s behind closed doors, with no transcripts available, not under oath. Hmmm. Guilty or innocent? Did the anyone of Clintons advisers request this? They had 1,052 chances.

richard-nixon-picture.jpg

My choice is to make sure that I safeguard the ability for presidents to get good decisions,” he said. “If the staff of a president operated in constant fear of being hauled before various committees to discuss internal deliberations, the president would not receive candid advice and the American people would be ill-served.
-George W. Bush, March 20, 2007

Officials-ImageF.00001.jpeg

It is absolutely necessary, if the President is to be able to do his job as the country expects, that he be able to talk openly and candidly with his advisers about issues and individuals. This kind of frank discussion is only possible when those who take part in it know that what they say is in strictest confidence.
-Richard M. Nixon, August 15, 1973

Of course the two men are not really comparable, but clear your mind for a second and give me an objective view of the person I’m about to decribe. They have nothing to hide, they’ve told no lies, they’ve done nothing wrong and to prove it they’re willing to testify but only if it’s behind closed doors, with no transcripts available, not under oath. Hmmm. Guilty or innocent? Did the anyone of Clintons advisers request this? They had 1,052 chances.

blog